hello andrew.
On 2016-02-04 07:07, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
Interesting draft, but it should certainly contain references to RFCs
5226 and 7500, and you wouldn’t want to duplicate any information
contained in either of those RFCs. For example, there’s some amount of
commonality between section 5.3 of this draft and section 6.4 of RFC 5226.
very useful pointers, thanks! i will look at those RFCs, add them as
references to the draft, and will try to make sure that there is
no/little overlap, and some alignment.
i have added your feedback as an open issue for the draft:
https://github.com/dret/I-D/issues/26
thanks and cheers,
dret.
--
erik wilde | mailto:erik(_dot_)wilde(_at_)dret(_dot_)net |
| http://dret.net/netdret |
| http://twitter.com/dret |