On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Fernando Gont
<fgont(_at_)si6networks(_dot_)com>
wrote:
The draft doesn't say that the host shouldn't accept information
provided by DHCPv6. It says that the host shouldn't request such
information if it has all it needs from something else.
Say you only receive a ULA/64 in the RA. Is that "all you needed"?
(particularly if there was a GUA available via DHCPv6)
I don't see what question that has to do with whether this document updates
RFC 4861 or not. Happy to discuss that question in another thread, but not
here. (The "all you needed" words aren't even in the draft - they are mine).