This documents looks fine to me.
I have one comment though.
In Section 6:
[RFC6110] defines the standard mapping of YANG data models to
Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) [ISO.19757-1]. This
section specifies the mapping for the extension statement
"md:annotation" (Section 7), which enables validation of XML instance
documents containing metadata annotations.
The first step of the DSDL mapping procedure, i.e., the
transformation of the YANG data model to the hybrid schema (see
sec. 6 in [RFC6110]), is modified as follows:
...
Does not this mean that the document updated RFC 6110 and this should be
mentioned in the header?
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of
The IESG
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:18 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: bclaise(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com; netmod-chairs(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-
metadata(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; kwatsen(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net;
netmod(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04.txt> (Defining and
Using Metadata with YANG) to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling Language
WG (netmod) to consider the following document:
- 'Defining and Using Metadata with YANG'
<draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2016-03-09. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document defines a YANG extension statement that allows for
defining metadata annotations in YANG modules. The document also
specifies XML and JSON encoding of annotations and other rules for
annotating instances of YANG data nodes.