ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Proposed New Note Well

2016-03-22 04:24:13
the IETF rules address the individual participant

Scott

On Mar 21, 2016, at 9:56 PM, lloyd(_dot_)wood(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk 
wrote:

What about participating in the IETF by proxy,
which is what corporations do?

 
Lloyd Wood lloyd(_dot_)wood(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk 
http://about.me/lloydwood 


From: Brian E Carpenter <brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2016, 12:14
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well

Hi,

I could live with this, although I am still happy enough with the old version.

By participating in the IETF,

I think this should say

By participating in the IETF in person, remotely, or on-line,

​BCP 25 (Working Group processes)
BCP 25 (Anti-Harassment Procedures)

Why two separate lines, when BCP 9 (6 different RFCs) only gets one line?

Regards
  Brian




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>