ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03

2016-05-04 21:05:53
Hi Russ, sorry for missing this.  I have a pull request open against
my spec with the changes I've made.

https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts/pull/31

On 19 April 2016 at 05:35, Russ Housley <housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com> wrote:

Minor Concerns:

I think it would really help
the reader to say at the beginning something like: "The confidentiality
protections ensure that media is protected from other applications, but
the confidentiality protections do not extend to traffic on the data
channels."

Yes, this is a good change.  I have adopted it.

I understand why authentication and confidentiality are often used
together.  However, it is very unclear to me why there ought to be a
linkage between c-webrtc and authentication since this service really
is only a promise to not share media with other applications.

I've trimmed down the text on authentication.  You are right that it
basically doesn't matter here.

After reading the whole document, I went back and read the Abstract
again.  I do not think it captures the real intent of the document.

I've taken a variation on your text.  I think that it's a better framing.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03, Martin Thomson <=