ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard

2016-05-11 11:43:03
I would propose adding some text to this draft (probably as a
sub-section in section 2) that says that the SIA defined in RFC 6487 is
omitted when a certificate is used to sign RPSL objects.

perhaps you might also include your reasoning for this seemingly odd
choice.

I agree that the original text allowing multiple signatures supports
the case where the components of the primary key of the object (i.e.,
prefix+ASN) come from different resource holders. I will restore that
text.

this is gonna be really simple; no complications at all i am sure.

btw, was this a consensus of the wg?

randy