I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2016-6-30
IETF LC End Date: 2016-7-4
IESG Telechat date: 2016-7-7
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as standard track RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
1. In section 2.1 "C (Co-routed path) bit: This informs the remote
T-PE/S-PEs about the properties of the underlying LSPs. When set, the
remote T-PE/S-PEs need to select co-routed LSP (as the forwarding tunnel) as
the reverse PSN tunnel. If there is no such tunnel available, it may
trigger the remote T-PE/S-PEs to establish a new LSP." Why are you using non
normative language here "need to" instead of MUST or SHOULD while for the S
bit normative language is used?
Nits/editorial comments:
1. In the abstract "TE" is not expanded, only later in the document