I actually don't worry that much about repeat discussions
unless they're likely to have, or have a history of having,
different outcomes. The main question I have when I look
at documents like this is the extent to which they'll solve
problems around making sure that our specifications are
sufficiently clear to implement from, and timely, and I'm
unconvinced that this will address either of those questions.
I'd like to think that our review processes are robust enough
to catch misuse.
Melinda
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature