Hi Ralph,
Please see inline [TR]
From: Ralph Droms [mailto:rdroms(_dot_)ietf(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 4:36 PM
To: Jari Arkko <jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net>
Cc: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <tireddy(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>;
draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery(_dot_)all(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; Review
Area gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org Team <gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; IETF
discussion list <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08
RI just completed a quick review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08.
The DNS Service Discovery section is much improved. I have a couple of
comments on the revised text:
I suggest adding a reference to the IANa "Service Name and Transport Protocol
Port Number Registry",
http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=Turn,
as the source of the service names "turn" and "turns".
[TR] Will refer to RFC5766 which introduced the above service names.
While the example DNS records for "exampleco TURN Server" are technically
correct, they would most likely be generated by the DNS-SD/mDNS library in a
server, rather than appearing in a DNS server zone file somewhere. For
clarity, it might be better to use the unicast DNS versions of the DNS-SD
records by substituting "example.com<http://example.com>" for "local".
[TR] May be I am missing something,
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6763#section-4.1.1 says the instance name will
not be machine-generated and will be a user-friendly name.
In my opinion, the details in section 5.1 are redundant with and (possibly) not
identical to the specification in RFC 6762 and RFC 6763. Specifically, Figure
1 includes a typo; there should be separate A/AAAA query and reply messages.
More generally, DNS-SD/mDNS servers may return the SRV, TXT, A and AAAA records
in the first reply, as an optimization. I think it would be better, in this
document, to specify simply that TURN servers and clients use the message
exchanges specified in those RFCs for TURN server discovery.
[TR] Sure, will remove the figure.
Thanks and Regards,
-Tiru
- Ralph
On Sep 1, 2016, at 4:05 AM, Jari Arkko
<jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net<mailto:jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net>>
wrote:
Ralph, Tiru — thanks for the updates and the review. I’ve looked at the change
draft and I think it is fine now.
Jari