On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Robert Sparks wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-02
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 21 Oct 2016
IETF LC End Date: 2 Nov 2016
IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled on a telechat
Summary: Ready with nits
Nits/editorial comments:
Shouldn't the IANA considerations instruct IANA to update the registries at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/kerberos-parameters/kerberos-parameters.xhtml
to update the three rows that currently point to 6112 to point to this
document instead (or at least in addition to 6112)?
Yes, thanks for spotting that.
Micro-nit: There is a 2119 MUST carried forward from RFC6112 that could be
improved if the group is willing. "Care MUST be taken by the TGS to not
reveal". I would suggest "The TGS MUST NOT reveal...". If you need to further
highlight care, add a sentence that says "Implementers need to be particularly
careful when addressing this requirement." It is a very small nit - please
feel free to ignore it.
That looks like a good change to me. Folks on kitten@, does anyone think
otherwise? If we do not get any objections, I think we can include that
in an RFC Editor Note.
-Ben