Maybe, since we all have admission-test tokens for our subscriptions,
we could be allowed to whitelist things we know we live behind? I
think any spammer motivated enough to subscribe to an IETF list *and*
drive the whitelist engine, deserves our attention..
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Paul Wouters <paul(_at_)nohats(_dot_)ca> wrote:
Using my redhat.com address, I replied to a draft alias email address
that includes myself, and the ietf mail server rejected the message
to me (or at least I hope the others still got it)
Is this a new ietf.org mail "feature" or did something on my redhat.com
end change?
Is there a way to make the email processing server at ietf.org a little
smarter to not check SPF for outgoing mails that were expanded by
itself?
Paul