Forwarding here, because Arnt only replied to the JMAP mailing list and
my reply to him went to the same place.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol
(jmap) - reducing configuration complexity
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:48:54 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey(_dot_)melnikov(_at_)isode(_dot_)com>
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt(_at_)gulbrandsen(_dot_)priv(_dot_)no>,
jmap(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
On 08/02/2017 12:56, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Randy Bush writes:
yet another protocol that requires a flag day. that has worked out
so well for ipv6.
JMAP does not, AFAICT, require a flag day, any more than IMAP required
a flag day over POP. If Fastmail's deployment of JMAP-in-spe was
noticed by its customers, the noise certainly hasn't been loud enough
that I've heard about it.
Agreed. JMAP and IMAP are likely to co-exist for long time.