ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-04

2017-02-16 07:20:12
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your review, please see below.
Al

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Halpern [mailto:jmh(_at_)joelhalpern(_dot_)com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 4:44 PM
To: gen-art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net(_dot_)all(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; 
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
bmwg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-04

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready

...
Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-02-05
IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-15
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational
RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
    The second figure in section 4.4 talks about the use of multiple
3x3 tables, but appears to show the use of multiple 4x4 tables.  This
reader found himself confused.

[ACM] 
The "3x3 matrix" refers to the cells of the table where 
user entries appear. The Header Row and Header Column
aren't included in the 3x3 matrix, but they do make the 
table appear as 4x4, as in the first figure of sec4.4. 
The Headings disappear in the second figure 
(due to size constraints), but the tables include
the 3x3 matrix as before.



Nits/editorial comments:



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>