In reviewing the document I noticed a small nit. Otherwise it looks okay to
me,.
In section 3.1:
s/Sections 4.1 and 4.3 [RFC2860]/Sections 4.1 and 4.3 of [RFC2860]/
Russ
On Feb 10, 2017, at 10:15 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Special-Purpose IP Address Registries'
<draft-bchv-rfc6890bis-04.txt> as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2017-03-10. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This memo updates the IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registries to
address issues raised by the definition of a global prefix. For
completeness, this memo contains all the assignments made to the IANA
Special-Purpose Address Registries.
This memo obsoletes RFC 6890.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bchv-rfc6890bis/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bchv-rfc6890bis/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.