On 02/24/2017 12:11 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
[....]
I just want the -bis document to reflect what is currently in the field
and we know works. Nothing more, nothing less.
I wholly agree with this as it applies to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis.
As a general comment, it should be reiterated that operational feedback
is critical to standards development and that if field deployment issues
are neglected, this damages the standards development process. It would
be unfortunate if this document fell prey to this folly.
+1
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont(_at_)si6networks(_dot_)com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492