Yes, I believe that the changes made were sufficient.
On 8 May 2017 at 22:15, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
<ietf(_at_)kuehlewind(_dot_)net> wrote:
Hi Martin,
just to double check: do you think this document is ready now and all your
comments have been addressed?
Mirja
Am 27.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
<sabine(_dot_)randriamasy(_at_)nokia-bell-labs(_dot_)com>:
Hello Martin,
I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been
moved in a section 1.1.
As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence
"When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is
used."
The update and status are available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/
Thanks,
Sabine
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin(_dot_)thomson(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39
To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-
bell-labs.com>
Cc: art(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; alto(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; draft-ietf-alto-multi-
cost(_dot_)all(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
<sabine(_dot_)randriamasy(_at_)nokia-bell-labs(_dot_)com> wrote:
This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords.
[SR ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language"
and
section "9.1. Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere?
The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate.
I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.