Hi Roni, and thank you for your review.
I was wondering why this document does not update RFC6052. My
reasoning is that RFC7915 section 6 says "The translator MUST support
the stateless address mapping algorithm defined in [RFC6052], which is
the default behavior." This document suggests that the mapping in
this document can be used.
There's nothing in RFC6052 that needs updating, as RFC6052 already
caters for the use of its stateless address mapping algorithm with
arbitrary IPv6 prefixes outside of the WKP 64:ff9b::/96.
Tore