On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:17 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Special-Use Domain Names
Problem Statement'
<draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2017-06-20. Exceptionally, comments
may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of
the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
The Special-Use Domain Names IANA registry policy defined in RFC 6761
has been shown through experience to present unanticipated
challenges. This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive,
of the problems that have been identified. In addition it reviews
the history of Domain Names and summarizes current IETF publications
and some publications from other organizations relating to Special-
Use Domain Names.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
Minor nit:
4.1.2. Special-Use Domain Names
Last part of the last sentence:"they can only use the mDNS protocol be used
for resolving that Domain Name."
Looks like "be used" is redundant and should be removed.
--
Bob Harold