Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop

mail-ng

2004-02-13 12:28:20


At 2:21 PM -0500 2/13/04, Keith Moore wrote:

I don't see that this is a requirement, but I do think it would be
a useful design choice if we could make it work.

I see it as a requirement for some of the other requirements we have,like definitive delivery notices and tracking.


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Paul Hoffman / IMC <= Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, william(at)elan.net Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Richard Welty Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Iljitsch van Beijnum Message not available Message not available Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, John Berthels Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Arnt Gulbrandsen

Previous by Date:	Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore
Next by Date:	Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore
Previous by Thread:	Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore
Next by Thread:	Re: Operations requirement: no hop-by-hop, Keith Moore
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]