Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
OK guys, let's hear 'em.
I have many issues with the Authentication-Results specification as it
now stands. I'll be writing a series of messages for different issues.
First a couple of nits.
There should be an indication somewhere that this header is on the
standards track.
I've gone round and round in my mind with what to do with this paragraph
in Section 1:
At the time of publication of this draft, only [AUTH] is a published
sender authentication standard. However, several more are in the
Internet Draft stage. As various methods emerge, it is necessary to
prepare their appearance and encourage convergence in the area of
interfacing these filters to MUAs.
It's good sales pitch, but I don't think it should really belong in the
final version of the RFC. I suggest that it be marked as a "Note (to be
removed on publication)". Also, change "prepare their" to "prepare for
their".
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html