At 21:54 22-03-2006, Tony Hansen wrote:
Wow. I know you're trying to deal with legacy MUAs. But this is placing
a recommendation onto the MTA to do something wrong to work around a
possible problem with any MUAs that *may* be connected to that MTA. Yuck.
This is a MUA specific feature which will remain for years to come
and may well be taken as a "standard" in future. By subverting the
Priority header, we prevent it from being used for the intended
purpose in an environment with this feature enabled.
I think you should just get rid of this section.
IIRC, I commented against this "feature" a year ago.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html