Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> Is this built on top of RFC 822 or 2822? If 2822, then CWFS should not > be specified before the :.Good catch. It should be 2822 so the CFWS before the colon should be removed.
Done. _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Auth-Results issues? #2 headerspec, Murray S. Kucherawy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Auth-Results issues #1, Tony Hansen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Auth-Results issues? #2 headerspec, Murray S. Kucherawy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Auth-Results issues? #10 section 7 IANA Considerations, Murray S. Kucherawy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |