I would be interested in seeing the new version.
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
This is the review from the IETF's security directorate. The -11
draft was submitted last week but hasn't yet been posted by the
secretariat. The results of this report will be worked into the
document and a -12 draft produced, and that's the one that will go to
IETF last call before handoff to the Area Director.
The -12 draft has been posted. I'm just waiting for the final OK from
the security directorate before doing a formal last-call and the handoff.
At MAAWG in San Francisco last week, there was keen interest in working
on my DKIM reporting proposal (draft-kucherawy-dkim-reporting) which is
currently at a -01 revision. I worked some of the feedback I got from
there into an -02 version and submitted it but I'm not sure I made the
IETF's pre-conference deadline (a few hours ago) so it may not be
visible for a couple of weeks.
Unless Dave objects, I'm going to use this venue to discuss that
proposal as well. Feel free to begin the conversation if there's
anything in there that is of interest. I can also post the -02 draft
here if people want to see what changed before it's posted by the
secretariat.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html