On July 14, 2003 at 14:46, "David Mathog" wrote:
I tried it and it turned up a bug in mharc. Here is my lists.def
minus the comments:
Description: Admin Messages for lists
Where is the first Name: option?
From-Address: Majordomo@
From-Address: majordomo@
From-Address: mailman-owner@
From-Address: .*-request@
From-Address: .*-help@
Period: year
Final: 1
Name: .r32q_mailerd_messages
Description: Mailer Daemon Messages
From-Address: MAILER-DAEMON
From-Address: MAILER-DAEMON@
Period: year
Final: 1
Name: biomail
Description: biomail Biology Division Mailing List
From-Address: biomail(_at_)caltech(_dot_)edu
From-Address: owner-biomail(_at_)its(_dot_)caltech(_dot_)edu
Address: biomail(_at_)caltech(_dot_)edu
Address: owner-biomail(_at_)its(_dot_)caltech(_dot_)edu
Period: year
Final: 1
Name: resolver
Description: Rosetta Resolver Mailing List
From-Address: .
Procmail-Condition: *
^Subject:.*(HEAT|Resolver|resolver|RESOLVER|Rosetta|rosetta|ROSETTA).*
Did your mailer wrap this line?
Period: year
Final: 1
Name: caltech-weekly
Description: Caltech weekly updates and other announcements
From-Address: (_dot_)*(_at_)(_dot_)*caltech(_dot_)edu
Period: year
Final: 1
Could you tar-gz up your lists.def and generated procmailrc.mharc
and send it to me? I need to examine the raw data to determine
if there is actually a bug or not.
--ewh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo(_at_)mhonarc(_dot_)org with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE MHARC-USERS
