namazu-users-en
[Top] [All Lists]

[Namazu-users-en] Re: namazu 2.0.17 field search results do not get sorted

2007-12-21 00:41:07
Dear Tadamasa, dear all.

Thanks for the prompt reply.

On Dec 21, 2007, at 15:24 , Tadamasa Teranishi wrote:
'--sort=date' is sorting based on the time-stamp on a file.
Not because of sorting in order of date field.

The correspondence of the time stamp of the date field and the
file might not be taken.

In my case the timestamp of the files and the date ofthe mail are  
similar.
But even using -sort=field:date is not working.

$ namazu -n 50 --sort=field:date  "+subject:validator" . | grep Date
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:45:21 -0500
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:56:58 +0900
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:11:28 +0900
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 10:03:26 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 16:56:26 -0400
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 01:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:23:14 +0900
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:11:00 +0000
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 17:01:04 +0900
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:50:48 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 22:25:06 +0900
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:11:43 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 00:32:07 +0200
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:57:02 -0500
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:53:23 -0500
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:29:08 +0100
...

Am I doing something wrong?

Note that I reported a similar issue with -sort=field:date a while ago  
but had no answer.
http://www.namazu.org/trac-namazu/trac.cgi/ticket/14

It is possible that I am making a mistake in the sort options, but I  
can't figure out what.

Any tip, ack of a bug or pointer to the documentation would be much  
appreciated!

Thank you,
olivier
-- 
olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/
W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status

_______________________________________________
Namazu-users-en mailing list
Namazu-users-en(_at_)namazu(_dot_)org
http://www.namazu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/namazu-users-en

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>