On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:43:01 PDT, Lyndon Nerenberg said:
On 10-10-05 2:14 PM, Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
What should the code do on systems that have both <utmp.h> and <utmpx.h>?
utmpx is the new POSIX flavour, so I'd defer to it over utmp in that case.
Sorry, my mind blanked for a bit when I saw comment that it needs
to be guarded with a freebsd version check. We have autoconf, why
isn't that doing the heavy lifting for us?
pgp0V0fT1YPEG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers