On 2012-03-26, at 12:26 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
Well, what if GNU Mailutils folks buy these changes? Then they would have to change the header fields to mailutils-* which would be annoying. Worse, it would then make the header fields incompatible when in fact they would be compatible.This header is just an implementation wart ... it's really only to communicate between different programs.
And this is why it's wrong to pretend they are headers. It leads to exactly this sort of misunderstanding. I still say the syntax should chance so there's no confusion as to what they really are – meta commands to nmh programs.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ralph Corderoy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |