On 2012-04-16, at 9:36 AM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
I'm not so crazy about "." as a replacement character, though. How about
this: if your locale is UTF-8 we use the standard UTF-8 replacement
character (U+FFFD, rendered as “�”), and any other locale we use a regular
old "?". That seems more intuitive to me.
'?' has a visual density similar to alphabetic characters, so it also obscures
the valid text. Using '.' as a placeholder makes it very clear that something
should have appeared in that character cell without obscuring the surrounding
text. U+FFFD suffers the same problem.
He?r??e i???s s??o?me g?arb??l?ed tex??t.
He.r..e i...s s..o.me g.arb..l.ed tex..t.
--lyndon
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers