On Feb 3, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Mike O'Dell <mo(_at_)ccr(_dot_)org> wrote:
ISO C can demand anything it wants about atomicity, but given that It Doesn't Rule The World, portability may make other demands. C is still useful even when the underlying runtime doesn't belong to that church.
I can't stop a system from not adhering to the standard. But I can say 'not our fault' if that behaviour breaks MH somehow. Although one might argue that, when it comes to C, the ISO C standards do rule the world. Given C's application as the language to bootstrap nearly all the other higher-level languages and runtimes, breaking your C compiler or library is going to have potentially dire consequences. --lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, Earl Hood |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] About mhshow tuning and replies to MIME messages with a attachments, Mikhail |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, Mike O'Dell |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] extensions on tmp filenames?, David Levine |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |