On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:44:38 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg writes:
I didn't think that 587 requires AUTH;It does. That's its entire point. (Read the RFC.)
that's not quite correct. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6409 4.3. Require Authentication The MSA MUST, by default, issue an error response to the MAIL command if the session has not been authenticated using [SMTP-AUTH], unless it has already independently established authentication or authorization (such as being within a protected subnetwork). so, accepting mail on 587 from localhost without smtp auth is fine, localhost being classifiable as 'protected subnetwork'. sendmail allows that automatically, for example. regards az -- Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 0xB963BD5F (or 0x42BD645D) + http://snafu.priv.at/ I keep six honest serving-men - (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When - And How and Where and Who -- Kipling
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers