Silly question. I don't see any mention of buffer cache effects being
worked around. Are you running a scan, tossing the results, then
rerunning the scan?
I know with rsync on large directory trees (even when nothing needs
changed), the second and later passes are substantially quicker and I
would expect a similar, albeit less pronounced (~5K files vs. ~1M in
my experiences), outcome here.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers