Ken wrote:
Can anyone think of a reason that for this specific case closefds() should NOT be moved from whatnowbr.c (and send.c) into sendsbr.c, and just in the child process?
That looks like a good change. The callers of sendsbr() shouldn't be concerned with its fork/exec. Those two closefds() have been there since early 1990, and maybe earlier. David -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ralph Corderoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nmh-workers] send fails, David Levine |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nmh-workers] closefds() _before_ fork?, Ken Hornstein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |