Ken Hornstein wrote in
<20210624180220.DACCF12A4B9@pb-smtp20.pobox.com>:
|>I seem to recall that you are slowly drifting towards a new
|>release, and as i was thrilled by RFC 9057 i thought i bring it to
|>your attention, in case you are not yet aware. I implemented it
|>for my mailer right away yesterday afternoon (i have not restarted
|>it yet though), as i think it good stuff that brings the email
|>protocol back into good shape, after it has been messed for DMARC
|>or whatever, resulting in all this terribe "x via y" From: lines,
|>and the misuse of Reply-To: etc etc.
|
|I THINK ... we can basically implement this via changing the mh-format
|templates?
If generated it should be identical to From: (not Sender:). When
replying my interpretation would be that it should be used in
favour of From: if it exists, and no reply-to: or
mail-followup-to: or however complicated the logic is, .. so
i would like to think you do not need to write C code in nmh?
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)