Gateway MWMGATE1 could not deliver your mail to cc:Mail user
w035_nw because of the error(s) cited below.
Your undelivered message follows:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*** Unknown message recipient ***
Subject: Re: Unique DNs
Date: 25-FEB-1993 18:25:06
-------------- The following note was forwarded to you by AWAY... -------------
Received: from mwunix.mitre.org by mwvm.mitre.org (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with TCP;
Thu, 25 Feb 93 18:12:38 EST
Return-Path: <pem-dev-relay(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM>
Received: from TIS.COM by mwunix.mitre.org (5.65c/SMI-2.2)
id AA23854; Thu, 25 Feb 1993 18:12:35 -0500
Received: by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64)
id AA26258; Thu, 25 Feb 93 16:55:02 EST
Received: from dbc.mtview.ca.us (ppp.dbc.mtview.ca.us) by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64)
id AA26240; Thu, 25 Feb 93 16:54:58 EST
Received: from localhost by dbc.mtview.ca.us (5.65/3.1.090690)
id AA03125; Thu, 25 Feb 93 13:52:51 -0800
To: vcerf(_at_)cnri(_dot_)reston(_dot_)va(_dot_)us ("Vinton G. Cerf")
Cc: pem-dev(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM, Carl Ellison
<cme(_at_)ellisun(_dot_)sw(_dot_)stratus(_dot_)com>,
yee(_at_)atlas(_dot_)arc(_dot_)nasa(_dot_)gov
Reply-To: pem-dev(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM
Subject: Re: Unique DNs
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Feb 1993 14:22:28 EST."
<9302251422(_dot_)aa13013(_at_)IETF(_dot_)CNRI(_dot_)Reston(_dot_)VA(_dot_)US>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1993 13:52:46 -0800
Message-Id: <3124(_dot_)730677166(_at_)dbc(_dot_)mtview(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us>
From: Marshall Rose <mrose(_at_)dbc(_dot_)mtview(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us>
Sender: pem-dev-relay(_at_)TIS(_dot_)COM
I was purposefully vague in that part of my response, and I'm glad that
you caught that.
Once a DN has been assigned to an entity, then that entity gets to
define the semantics associated with subordinate DNs.
So, in the case of a CA and its customers, I don't think you have a problem.
/mtr