Steve Kent wrote:
I am asking
Ned Freed and Greg Voudreuil to ensure that the currently posted I-D
on this topic represents a version that incorporates all of the
comments they have received (and were willing to incorporate). I am
asking John Linn, Jeff Schiller and Ted T'so to review this version to
ensuer that they feel it adequately addresses their concerns about
minimizing the impact on existing 1421-compliant implementations. Of
course, everyone else is encouraged to participate in reviewing this
I-D, but I am requesting this effort from some of the most active and
vocal participants in hopes of arriving in Amsterdam with a concensus.
In setting out to Do the Good and Right Thing, I have a question:
at this point in time, should draft-ietf-pem-mime-02.txt be read
in conjunction with RFC-1341, draft-ietf-822ext-mime2-04.txt, or
are the documents equivalent for purposes of PEM feature integration?
--jl