Date: Mon, 22 Nov 93 14:06:28 -0500
From: Steve Kent <kent(_at_)BBN(_dot_)COM>
To the extent that RIPEM format diverges from PEM, perhaps
there should be a separate discussion list for exploring extensions
to RIPEM, to avoid confusion with PEM format issues.
Steve,
perhaps there should be two lists. I usually send RIPEM questions
straight to Mark.
However, in this case, I had assumed that PEM's use of a
distinguished name as the main identification method would lead to the same
problem -- an inability for one DN to have more than one key -- so I
included the PEM list in my question. Was I incorrect in my assumption?
- Carl