For now, one could special case the RSA residential PCA (i.e., require CA level name subordination EXCEPT for the the RSADSI residential PCA), although I personally hate to suggest that sort of kludge.
The is the exact route I've taken. However, the appearance of the TIS Residential CA outside of the subordination framework suggested, I became concerned that this would become the norm. I am glad to hear that an effort is being made to address this issue. -Ray
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: identifying attribute types, jueneman%wotan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | New Version of TechMail-PEM available, Jeffrey I. Schiller |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: identifying attribute types, jueneman%wotan |
Next by Thread: | New Version of TechMail-PEM available, Jeffrey I. Schiller |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |