X-Sender: nessett(_at_)ocfmail(_dot_)llnl(_dot_)gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 1994 08:36:13 -0800
From: nessett(_at_)ocfmail(_dot_)ocf(_dot_)llnl(_dot_)gov (Dan Nessett)
Cc: sob(_at_)hsdndev(_dot_)harvard(_dot_)edu,
smart(_at_)mel(_dot_)dit(_dot_)csiro(_dot_)au, spock(_at_)rsa(_dot_)com,
pem-dev(_at_)tis(_dot_)com, Jueneman(_at_)gte(_dot_)com
Jeff,
I understand your first example, which justifies the need for encrypted
only messages. However, I don't understand the second, which is :
>2) I have a social worker who wants to provide confidential advise to
>students and/or employees. Because of the sensitive nature of the
>communications involved I want them to all be encrypted. Furthermore
>I may want to have some "continuity" of conversation over several messages.
>I can provide a communications infrastructure that hides the transport,
>but I need the "privacy enhancement" technology to support this as well.
Why does the social worker require anonymity?
The social worker doesn't, but the student they are counciling may. I
apologize if my wording was a little unclear.
-Jeff