In a recent message, I said "there is not yet an MD6." One respondent asked, in effect, "Why might there be an MD6? Is something wrong with MD5?" Nothing is wrong with MD5. But we might develop an MD6 someday when 64-bit architectures become the norm; MD5 is designed for 32-bit architectures. MD5 would still be secure, but MD6 would be faster. I just wanted to leave the possibility open that MD5 is not the last message-digest algorithm from RSA Data Security. -- Burt
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Certificate DNs, CA-Naming, Richard . Ankney |
---|---|
Next by Date: | single-pass processing in MIME, Jeff Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | Certificate DNs, CA-Naming, Francisco Jordan |
Next by Thread: | single-pass processing in MIME, Jeff Thompson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |