Re: semantics of ANSI X9.xx-1994 digital signatures and certificates

At 12:29 PM 11/18/94 -0800, Peter Williams wrote:
> Warwick,
>
> Let us take the two questions separately. This discussion of the
> issues is general in purpose, as I am not a member of the PEM WG . . . .

Everone who participates actively in an IETF working group's discussion
list is a true member of that working group.  Attendance at an IETF is not
a requirement for membership.  Welcome!  (Find attached your share of the
glory/blame.)  :-)