Dennis,
If you are going to retain messages for a long time, in
encrypted form, it makes sense to transform your per-recipient token
into a form that can be decrypted using an archive key that is managed
locally. Long term signature verification reuqires acquiring and
retaining the relevent certificates and CRLs.
Steve
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: limitations of mime-pem transformation, Steve Kent |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: comment on relay/MLA authentication, Peter Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Viewpoint of a PEM, MIME, etc customer, Dennis Doubleday |
| Next by Thread: | PEM vs. WEB -- A user perspective, Ali Bahreman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |