Rhys, In contrast to your example, I often encounter checks that explicitly state that if the value of the check is greater than some stated amount, then two signatures must be present. Since there is no universal convention about what values trigger the requirement for an additional signature, a bank would not refuse to honor a check with only one signature where two are required by the check issuer, unless the issuer makes this requirement explicit. Steve
Previous by Date: | Re: Key selector survey, Mr Rhys Weatherley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: limitations of mime-pem transformation, Peter Williams |
Previous by Thread: | Re: limitations of mime-pem transformation, Mr Rhys Weatherley |
Next by Thread: | Re: limitations of mime-pem transformation, Steve Crocker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |