Isn't there a perfectly standard place to put a timestamp? If you PEM-protect a whole message, including headers (MIME body part headers or full message headers), the headers can include a DATE: field. The obvious attack using unverified timestamps is to steal a key, have the key revoked, and start sending messages with a Date: field that is before the time the key was revoked, but for the "sequence" usage, protecting the Date: field seems good enough. Harald A
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Time stamps, Mark S Feldman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Q: PEM and secure EDI on the Internet, James M Galvin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Time stamps, Mark S Feldman |
Next by Thread: | Re: Time stamps, jueneman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |