At 9:52 AM 5/4/95, Phil Smiley wrote:
I agree with Mr Ford's first point stated below. In fact, I would prefer to
see a binding of the mosskey-data item to the associated moss-signed item.
That would simplify handling of multiple signed items and associated data
items
in one mesage.
this specification has been under discussion for quite awhile. The
nature of this current concern would seem to be nothing particularly new.
Why is this requirement being raised now?
d/
--------------------
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg Consulting +1 408 246 8253
675 Spruce Dr. fax: +1 408 249 6205
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
dcrocker(_at_)networking(_dot_)stanford(_dot_)edu