If I defined an X.509 v3 extension: foo EXTENSION ::= { SYNTAX BOOLEAN : FALSE IDENTIFIED BY id-foo } The DER-coding of a "false" boolean value for the extension would presumably not exist in the byte stream, under DER default coding rules. That is, the octet-string of the extension identified by id-foo would have no content octets, and thus be of length 0. Anyone disagree?
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Audit & Security Reviews, alc |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: DER coding of a default syntax value, Bancroft Scott |
Previous by Thread: | Audit & Security Reviews, alc |
Next by Thread: | Re: DER coding of a default syntax value, Bancroft Scott |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |