[Encode] Static build caveats

On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 06:05 , Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Static builds versus Encode solved; good news is that no changes at
> Encode side required, I just needed to teach Configure a bit.  One
> thing, though, to keep in mind in future: Encode subextensions should
> stick to (as it now does)
>
>         Encode/Foo/Foo.xs
>
> naming, so that Configure can easily locate the subextensions.
  Glad to hear that.  Well, to be more exact,

  Encode/Foo/Foo.xs

  do not exist at first; they are autogenerated via

  Encode/Foo/Makefile.PL

  So they are guaranteed to be "Foo/Foo" form unless Makefile.PL is 
bleached in some way.
Dan the Encode Maintainer