perl-unicode

Re: [Encode] Encoding vs. Charset

2002-03-25 20:36:31
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:58:58AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
* rename gb2312 to gb2312-raw, ksc5601 to ksc5601-raw
-raw sounds funny, as if it were somehow "unprocessed" version.
How about -strict?

the -raw was my original suggestion. Anton however has a different
proposal:

Anton> Autrijus, will you allow me to advocate
Anton> GB_2312-80  
Anton> for the 7-bit GB 2312?
Anton> li s is the name used both in the IANA registry and rfc 1345.

I'm okay either way. But not 'strict' please; unprocessed versions
are simply what they are.

Personally, I'd say go for '-raw'.

/Autrijus/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>