I hope it was not too premature to release Encode-1.69, now available as
follows.
Whole:
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/Encode-1.69.tar.gz and CPAN
Diff against current: 180 lines
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/current-1.69.diff.gz
And here are Changes
$Revision: 1.69 $ $Date: 2002/05/04 16:41:18 $
! lib/Encode/MIME/Header.pm
Floating-point coerced for UNICOS (in integer arithmetics it folds
line one character too early). Verification by Mark is pending.
Message-Id: <C670F60D-5F4F-11D6-A5CA-00039301D480(_at_)dan(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp>
! Unicode/Unicode.pm
more doc patch from Elizabeth
Message-Id:
<4(_dot_)2(_dot_)0(_dot_)58(_dot_)20020503210946(_dot_)02f4ed30(_at_)mickey(_dot_)dijkmat(_dot_)nl>
! Encode/Makefile_PL.e2x
More platform-independent patch from Benjamin
Message-Id: <3CD31BE0(_dot_)69F79B06(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net>
! lib/Encode/Guess AUTHORS
split regex fix by Graham Barr. Adds him to AUTHORS.
Message-Id: <20020504085419(_dot_)E95940(_at_)valueclick(_dot_)com>
! Encode/Makefile_PL.e2x
enc2xs script discovery made smarter and more sensible, first cited
by Miyagawa-kun and further suggestions by Rafael and Andreas
! Encode.pm lib/Encode/Guess.pm t/fallback.t t/guess.t t/mime-header.t
"The EBCDIC remapping of the low 256 bites again" #16372 by jhi
UNICOS needs verification by Mark or others. I am fairly sure of the
cause of failure and equally sure of the fix. But I am not sure if
UNICOS groks what I mean...
Dan the Encode Maintainer
P.S. I think we are very, very close to 5.8.0-RC1 but will we make it
on May 8th so we can claim "we are only a month behind" ?
