On Tuesday, Oct 1, 2002, at 10:56 Asia/Tokyo, Autrijus Tang wrote:
Encode::TW is correct, Encode::Alias not.
/Autrijus/
--- /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-freebsd/Encode/Alias.pm Thu Jun 6
22:31:31 2002
+++ lib/Encode/Alias.pm Tue Oct 1 09:55:24 2002
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
define_alias( qr/\bks_c_5601-1987$/i => '"cp949"' );
# for Encode::TW
define_alias( qr/\bbig-?5$/i => '"big5-eten"' );
- define_alias( qr/\bbig5-?et(?:en)$/i => '"big5-eten"' );
+ define_alias( qr/\bbig5-?et(?:en)?$/i => '"big5-eten"' );
define_alias( qr/\btca[-_]?big5$/i => '"big5-eten"' );
define_alias( qr/\bbig5-?hk(?:scs)?$/i => '"big5-hkscs"' );
define_alias( qr/\bhk(?:scs)?[-_]?big5$/i => '"big5-hkscs"' );
<mime-attachment>
/¥bAutrijus¥b/,
Thanx. applied in my repository. HV, please go ahead w/ this patch for
5.9.
But how serious do you consider this bug is? I considered the last one
(*.ucm fix) very serious and did $VERSION++ as soon as I reckoned
(which took much longer than it should've been. Sorry). But this one
I am not so sure because I guess most users would simply use 'big5'.
How many users do you think will (use|be using) 'big5-et'?
I would like to polish further before I commit $Encode::VERSION++
unless you object and call for immediate release.
Dan the Encode Maintainer
