perl-unicode

Re: [PATCH] oops.

2002-10-01 01:30:06
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:40:57AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
But how serious do you consider this bug is?  I considered the last one 
(*.ucm fix) very serious and did $VERSION++ as soon as I reckoned 
(which took much longer than it should've been.  Sorry).  But this one 
I am not so sure because I guess most users would simply use 'big5'.  
How many users do you think will (use|be using) 'big5-et'?

Practically nobody.  It's just the disagreement with document. :)

I would like to polish further before I commit $Encode::VERSION++ 
unless you object and call for immediate release.

I don't even envision this affect the release schedule in any way.
Its importance is, imho, not much more than a POD typo fix.

Thanks,
/Autrijus/

Attachment: pgpmdHSR4VK1U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH] oops., Autrijus Tang <=